Should Laws be Natural or Positive?

The whole argument about whether laws should be Positive or Traditional Natural Law will never end. Each has their own valid argument. Whether Positivists like it or not, Positive stems from Traditional Natural Law. The laws that are written down came from laws that were in existence of some form and the laws that were in existence were moral laws. All Positive laws are derived from the Ten Commandments. The last five Commandments have clearly influenced certain laws that are still in place. Most of the written laws we were taught as children, under the pretense of the Golden Rule. People grow up knowing most of the written laws because they were taught, as children, that certain acts are wrong or “not nice.” I do believe that Positive Law is more secular and easier to understand then Moral Law, but not necessarily more valid. I am ruled more by Moral Law then Positive Law, but my morals just happened to coincide with most Positive Law. And the morals that don’t coincide with Positive Law, I just haven’t been caught doing yet. I think Moral Law refines the sticky area of Positive Law. Taking the religion out of a law makes it more applicable to more people. If every person had the same religion then Moral Law would still rule the land. Positive and Moral Law both serve the same purpose; to control the masses. Laws and rules of any kind are made to prevent anarchy.